| |
 |
1.
(2009 02 01 15:25)
objektyvas uzrasojo?? :)+
|
|
| |
| |
 |
2.
(2009 02 01 15:26)
soft focus objektyvas.
|
|
| |
| |
 |
3.
(2009 02 01 16:23)
1/ ir tau uzrasotu tokia moteri pamacius ... :)
|
|
| |
| |
 |
4.
(2009 02 01 16:56)
meniškai užrasojo
|
|
| |
| |
|
5.
(2009 02 01 17:01)
cia gi niekas neuzrasojo! nesat girdeje apie soft focus'o objektyvus?studijoje fotkinta,kokie dar uzrasojimai :)
|
|
| |
| |
|
6.
(2009 02 01 17:04)
5/ Suprast tai supratom tik siaip,kad linksmiau butu... :)
|
|
| |
| |
|
7.
(2009 02 01 17:10)
a nu,aisku,tada ,linksminkites :)
|
|
| |
| |
 |
8.
(2009 02 01 17:30)
švelniai
|
|
| |
| |
 |
9.
(2009 02 01 18:13)
liuks +
|
|
| |
| |
 |
|
|
| |
| |
 |
11.
(2009 02 02 10:21)
IMHO - it would be nice picture... but if you use "high key", you should carefully determine dark point, besause it is the main attractive point for view - and what is important here?
It is the main question that discriminate real "high key" picture from just bright one...
|
|
| |
| |
 |
12.
(2009 02 02 17:05)
neįtikėtinas švelnumas
subtilu
|
|
| |
